| General Information | |
| 00: Table of content | true |
| 01: Date of notification | 2025-11-14 |
| 02: Statement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | This crypto-asset white paper has not been approved by any competent authority in any Member State of the European Union. The person seeking admission to trading of the crypto-asset is solely responsible for the content of this crypto-asset white paper. |
| 03: Compliance statement in accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | This crypto-asset white paper complies with Title II of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council and, to the best of the knowledge of the management body, the information presented in the crypto-asset white paper is fair, clear and not misleading and the crypto-asset white paper makes no omission likely to affect its import. |
| 04: Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (a), (b), (c), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | The crypto-asset referred to in this crypto-asset white paper may lose its value in part or in full, may not always be transferable and may not be liquid. |
| 05: Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | False |
| 06: Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | The crypto-asset referred to in this white paper is not covered by the investor compensation schemes under Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council or the deposit guarantee schemes under Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| SUMMARY | |
| 07: Warning in accordance with Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | Warning This summary should be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset white paper. The prospective holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto-asset on the content of the crypto-asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other offer documents pursuant to the applicable national law. This crypto-asset white paper does not constitute a prospectus as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council or any other offer document pursuant to Union or national law. |
| 08: Characteristics of the crypto-asset | Theoriq's THQ token is a pre-launch, fixed-supply (1 billion) fungible token serving as the value and coordination layer of Theoriq's onchain agent economy. It supports staking and locking mechanisms that secure the protocol and reward participation. Token allocations include multi-year vesting for contributors and investors, while community-sale tokens unlock fully at TGE. |
| 09: Further information about utility tokens | Not applicable as THQ is not a utility token. |
| 10: Key information about the offer to the public or admission to trading | This white paper has been prepared for the purposes of seeking admission to trading on the crypto-asset trading platform operated by Coinbase Luxembourg S.A. |
| Part A - Information about the Offeror or the Person Seeking Admission to Trading | |
| A.1: Name | Theoriq (BVI) Ltd. |
| A.2: Legal form | BVI Limited |
| A.3: Registered address | 3rd Floor, Palm Grove House, Road Town, Tortola, VG1110, British Virgin Islands. |
| A.4: Head office | 3rd Floor, Palm Grove House, Road Town, Tortola, VG1110, British Virgin Islands |
| A.5: Registration date | 2024-10-25 |
| A.6: Legal entity identifier | 2549008HR6RRRZ9ZI573 |
| A.7: Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | BVI Company Number: 2161161 |
| A.8: Contact telephone number | 1 345 917 0795 |
| A.9: E-mail address | mugglestone@horizonsglobal.io |
| A.10: Response time (days) | 30 |
| A.11: Parent company | Theoriq Foundation |
| A.12: Members of management body | Register of Directors of Theoriq (BVI) Ltd are as follows: Theoriq Foundation - Director Date of Appointment: 25 October 2024 Address: PO BOX 144, 3119 9 Forum Labe, Camana Bay, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1 - 9006 |
| A.13: Business activity | Theoriq is focused on developing an infrastructure layer that enables autonomous AI agents and agent swarms to collaborate, optimize liquidity, and perform complex financial operations onchain within decentralized finance (DeFi). Its principal activities include providing tools for autonomous trading, yield optimization, treasury management, and liquidity provisioning, all powered by the native THQ token, which serves as the value and coordination layer for the agentic economy. Theoriq's ecosystem supports staking, locking, and delegation of THQ to secure the network and incentivize participation. The principal markets for Theoriq are DeFi protocols, projects with native tokens seeking advanced financial primitives, capital allocators (both institutional and retail investors) aiming to optimize capital deployment and yield, and agent developers who wish to build, deploy, and monetize AI agents for complex DeFi use cases. |
| A.14: Parent company business activity | The parent company behind Theoriq BVI is Theoriq Foundation. It is an Exempted Limited Guarantee Foundation Company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with Limited Liability on 13 September 2024. Its principal objectives are
|
| A.15: Newly established | True |
| A.16: Financial condition for the past three years | Not applicable as the person seeking admission to trading was established in 2024. |
| A.17: Financial condition since registration | Financial information of Theoriq BVI Ltd for the year ending 31st December 2024 is as follows: Assets Loans & Receivables - 459 USD Investments & other financial assets - 0 USD Tangible fixed assets - 0 USD Intangible assets - 6,302 USD Total assets - 6,761 USD Liabilities Accounts payable - 3,285USD Long-term debts - 0 USD Other liabilities - 459 USD Total liability - 3,744 USD Shareholder's equity - 3,017 USD |
| Part B - Information about the Issuer, If Different from the Offeror or Person Seeking Admission to Trading | |
| B.1: Issuer different from offerror or person seeking admission to trading | False |
| B.2: Name | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.3: Legal form | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.4: Registered address | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.5: Head office | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.6: Registration date | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.7: Legal entity identifier | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.8: Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.9: Parent company | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.10: Members of management body | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.11: Business activity | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| B.12: Parent company business activity | Not applicable as the issuer is the person seeking admission to trading. |
| Part C - Information about the Operator of the Trading Platform | |
| C.1: Name | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.2: Legal form | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.3: Registered address | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.4: Head office | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.5: Registration date | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.6: Legal entity identifier | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.7: Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.8: Parent company | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.9: Reason for crypto-asset white paper preparation | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.10: Members of management body | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.11: Operator business activity | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.12: Parent company business activity | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| C.13: Other persons drawing up the crypto-asset white paper according to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | Not applicable as offeror is not admitting crypto asset to trading. |
| C.14: Reason for drawing the white paper by persons referred to in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | Not applicable as the operator of the platform is not admitting the crypto-asset to trading |
| Part D - Information about the Crypto-Asset Project | |
| D.1: Crypto-asset project name | Theoriq. |
| D.2: Crypto-asset name | THQ |
| D.3: Abbreviation | THQ |
| D.4: Crypto-asset project description | Purpose and Goals: Key Features and Operation:
|
| D.5: Details of all natural or legal persons involved in implementation of crypto-asset project | Ron Bodkin – CEO & Co-Founder, ChainML* *Note: ChainML is the developer of Theoriq technology |
| D.6: Utility token classification | False |
| D.7: Key features of goods or services for utility token projects | Not applicable as THQ is not a utility token. |
| D.8: Plans for the token | Achievements: The project has also defined a comprehensive tokenomics structure for THQ, detailing its capped supply, allocation, and multi-year incentive programs. The team has also designed a phased rollout plan for staking, locking, delegation, and agent module integration, and outlined mechanisms for community participation and governance. These deliverables establish the groundwork for the upcoming mainnet launch and future protocol development. Future Milestones (Proposed Timeline):
The THQ token will serve as the value and coordination layer, enabling staking, governance, agent delegation, and access to protocol features and rewards throughout these milestones. |
| D.9: Resource allocation | Financial Resources:
Human Resources:
Technological Resources:
Other Significant Investments:
|
| D.10: Planned use of collected funds or other tokens | Theoriq (THQ) plans to use its crypto-assets to support ecosystem incentives, strategic partnerships, and ongoing protocol operations through its treasury. Funds are also allocated to reward contributors, ambassadors, agent operators, and the broader community, as well as to incentivize adoption and engagement both before and after token generation. Protocol fees collected from agent activities are used for buybacks, rewards distribution, and partner incentives. Staking and locking mechanisms secure the network and align long-term participation, while delegated and locked tokens serve as collateral for agent performance, with slashing and burning reinforcing security and accountability. Active treasury management is exercised to support ecosystem initiatives, engagement, and continued adoption. |
| Part E - Information about the Offer to the Public of Crypto-Assets or their Admission to Trading | |
| E.1: Public offering or admission to trading | ATTR |
| E.2: Reasons for public offer or admission to trading | Enable EU market access for THQ holders. |
| E.3: Fundraising target | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.4: Minimum subscription goals | There are no minimum target subscription goals. |
| E.5: Maximum subscription goals | There are no maximum target subscription goals. |
| E.6: Oversubscription acceptance | There are no oversubscriptions accepted. |
| E.7: Oversubscription allocation | There are no oversubscriptions accepted. |
| E.8: Issue price | There is no issue price, as the crypto asset is already in issuance. |
| E.9: Official currency determining issue price | There is no official currency as the crypto asset is already in issuance. |
| E.10: Subscription fee | There are no subscription fees. |
| E.11: Offer price determination method | Not applicable, as this whitepaper is published in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.12: Total number of offered or traded other tokens | 1,000,000,000 |
| E.13: Targeted holders | ALL |
| E.14: Holder restrictions | There are no restrictions. |
| E.15: Reimbursement notice | There are no reimbursement rights. |
| E.16: Refund mechanism | There is no refund mechanism. |
| E.17: Refund timeline | There is no refund mechanism. |
| E.18: Offer phases | There are no phases. |
| E.19: Early purchase discount | There are no discounts. |
| E.20: Time-limited offer | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.21: Subscription period beginning | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.22: Subscription period end | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.23: Safeguarding arrangements for offered funds or other tokens | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.24: Payment methods for other token purchase | Fiat or other crypto assets. |
| E.25: Value transfer methods for reimbursement | There are no reimbursement rights. |
| E.26: Right of withdrawal | Not applicable. This whitepaper is published solely in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.27: Transfer of purchased other tokens | Via crypto-asset trading platforms on which THQ is admitted to trading. |
| E.28: Transfer time schedule | There are no relevant time schedule |
| E.29: Purchaser's technical requirements | There are no technical requirements. |
| E.30: Other token service provider (CASP) name | Not applicable. |
| E.31: CASP identifier | Not applicable |
| E.32: Placement form | NTAV |
| E.33: Trading platforms name | Coinbase Luxembourg S.A. |
| E.34: Trading platforms market identifier code (MIC) | XNAS |
| E.35: Trading platforms access | Online via the platform. |
| E.36: Involved costs | Not applicable. |
| E.37: Offer expenses | Not applicable, as this whitepaper is published in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| E.38: Conflicts of interest | The issuer is not aware of any potential conflict of interest of the persons involved in its admission to trading. |
| E.39: Applicable law | British Virgin Islands |
| E.40: Competent court | British Virgin Islands |
| Part F - Information about the Crypto-Assets | |
| F.1: Other token type | THQ is a crypto-asset as defined under MiCAR, which is not an “e-money token”, “an asset-referenced token” or a “utility token”, each as defined under MiCAR. Therefore, it falls in the "Other" category |
| F.2: Other token functionality | THQ Token Functionalities and Rights:
|
| F.3: Planned application of functionalities | Below is a summary of the planned phases and their associated functionalities, as described in official documents:
No specific dates are available for token generation event, activation of staking, lock-up, delegation, or other token functionalities |
| F.4: Type of crypto-asset white paper | OTHR |
| F.5: Type of submission | NEWT |
| F.6: Other token characteristics | Theoriq's THQ token is a pre-launch, fixed-supply (1 billion) fungible cryptographic token designed as the value and coordination layer for an onchain agent economy. Technically, THQ is implemented as an upgradeable smart contract using the UUPS proxy pattern, with role-based access control, pausable and burnable features, and a capped minting function. Staking THQ yields sTHQ (ERC-4626 compliant), which can be further locked to mint non-transferable αTHQ, enabling time-weighted participation and delegation to agents; both staking and locking underpin protocol security and reward mechanisms, with slashing for misbehavior. Token allocations include multi-year vesting for contributors and investors, and phased rollout is planned. However, tokens allocated to community sale will be 100% unlocked at TGE |
| F.7: Commercial name or trading name | Theoriq . |
| F.8: Website of the issuer | https://www.theoriq.ai/ |
| F.9: Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading | 2025-12-11 |
| F.10: Publication date | 2025-12-11 |
| F.11: Any other services provided by the issuer | Not applicable |
| F.12: Language or languages of white paper | English. |
| F.13: Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which the white paper relates, where available | Not available |
| F.14: Functionally fungible group digital token identifier, where available | Not available |
| F.15: Voluntary data flag | FALSE |
| F.16: Personal data flag | TRUE |
| F.17: LEI eligibility | TRUE |
| F.18: Home member state | Luxembourg |
| F.19: Host member states | Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden |
| Part G - Information on the Rights and Obligations attached to the Crypto-Assets | |
| G.1: Purchaser rights and obligations | THQ is the native token of Theoriq's Alpha protocol, designed as the value and coordination layer for an onchain agent economy. Ownership of THQ does not confer equity or legal ownership in Theoriq, but provides economic rights through access to protocol rewards. Access & Usage RightsHolding THQ provides access to use Alpha protocol products, interact with agents, and receive discounts on fees. Projects integrating Alpha (for DeFi, automation, or AI agent tasks) must hold or stake THQ, linking participation to ownership. Staking RightsHolders can stake THQ to get sTHQ, earning emissions (yield) and partner rewards. Staked tokens contribute to network security and can be withdrawn after a minimum period. Stakers also influence optimization algorithms (e.g., BOTS) where stake affects swarm composition. Delegation RightsαTHQ can be delegated to specific agents. Delegating boosts an agent’s visibility and execution capacity, grants the delegator fee discounts and shares in agent-level rewards. Delegation can be split (“restaked”) across multiple agents simultaneously. Governance RightssTHQ holders can lock their tokens for a specific period and get αTHQ which include the governance rights, including: Approving slashing penalties (requires super-majority vote) and Influencing protocol upgrades and ecosystem initiatives. Responsibilities and ObligationsTo earn returns or influence, holders must actively stake or lock tokens. Passive holding alone yields no benefits. Delegated αTHQ (and its underlying sTHQ) is slash-eligible collateral: if an agent underperforms, behaves dishonestly, or violates protocol rules, the delegated stake can be burned. This introduces an explicit accountability obligation—delegators must choose agents prudently |
| G.2: Exercise of rights and obligations | Procedures for Exercising Rights with Theoriq (THQ) Token: Accessing Protocol Services and Discounts Acquire and hold THQ tokens to unlock access to the Theoriq Alpha protocol and partner projects. Use THQ holdings to receive discounts when interacting with agents on the protocol. Staking (THQ → sTHQ) Stake THQ tokens to mint sTHQ (staked THQ), which secures the network and enables stakers to earn protocol emissions and potential partner rewards. Staked THQ can be withdrawn after a minimum staking period. Locking (sTHQ → αTHQ) Lock sTHQ for a chosen duration (between 1 and 24 months) using the AlphaLocker to mint αTHQ (Alpha THQ), a non-transferable, time-weighted power token. Locked tokens earn enhanced emissions and may receive additional partner incentives. After the lock period, the original sTHQ is returned. Delegation and Endorsements (αTHQ Delegation) αTHQ holdings can be delegated to specific AI agents to boost their capacity and ranking. Delegators are entitled to protocol fee discounts and a share of agent-specific rewards. Delegated αTHQ acts as slash-eligible collateral; if the agent misbehaves, the delegated stake may be slashed. Governance (Voting) αTHQ holders participate in governance, including voting on slashing events and protocol upgrades. A supermajority of αTHQ holders is required to approve slashing for protocol failures or malicious behavior. Note: As Theoriq (THQ) is a pre-launch token, all procedures are subject to change and may be updated upon mainnet launch or further protocol development. |
| G.3: Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations | αTHQ holders have governance rights over the protocol. In the future, they may vote on proposals that could potentially affect the core protocol functions, including but not limited to, the rights and obligations of the token holders. |
| G.4: Future public offers | There are no future offers planned. |
| G.5: Issuer retained other token | The issuer of Theoriq (THQ) has allocated 28% of the total token supply to the Treasury. With a fixed supply of 1 billion THQ tokens, this means 280,000,000 THQ are retained by the issuer's Treasury for ecosystem incentives, strategic partnerships, and ongoing protocol operations. |
| G.6: Utility token classification | False |
| G.7: Key features of goods or services utility tokens | Not applicable as THQ is not a utility token. |
| G.8: Utility tokens redemption | Not applicable as THQ is not a utility token. |
| G.9: Non-trading request | TRUE |
| G.10: Other tokens purchase or sale modalities | Not applicable, as this whitepaper is published in relation to the admission to trading of the THQ token and does not relate to any public offering. |
| G.11: Other tokens transfer restrictions | Blacklist (Ban Mechanism): The smart contract enforces a ban system. Addresses that are banned in the Registry cannot transfer or receive THQ tokens. Admins can ban or unban users, and this is checked on every transfer. Global Pause: Admins have the ability to pause all token transfers and contract operations. When paused, no transfers can occur until unpaused. Staking and Locking Restrictions: Staking THQ to receive sTHQ requires a minimum staking period (exact duration not specified in the context). sTHQ can be withdrawn only after this period. Locking sTHQ in the AlphaLocker for 1–24 months mints αTHQ, which is non-transferable. Locked sTHQ cannot be transferred until the lock expires. |
| G.12: Supply adjustment protocols | False |
| G.13: Supply adjustment mechanisms | Not applicable |
| G.14: Token value protection schemes | False |
| G.15: Token value protection schemes description | Not applicable |
| G.16: Compensation schemes | False |
| G.17: Compensation schemes description | Not applicable |
| G.18: Applicable law | British Virgin Islands |
| G.19: Competent court | British Virgin Islands |
| Part H - Information on the underlying technology | |
| H.1: Distributed ledger technology (DTL) | Theoriq (THQ) uses a hybrid blockchain architecture to support its agent-driven ecosystem. Token distribution is structured to encourage broad participation and long-term alignment: 24% of THQ is allocated to core contributors (with vesting), 30% to investors, 18% to community incentives, and 28% to the treasury for ecosystem growth. Security is maintained through staking and slashing mechanisms. Users and agents stake THQ to secure the network, and delegated stakes can be slashed if agents misbehave, reinforcing protocol integrity. Access control uses public key infrastructure (PKI) and granular permissions to protect sensitive data. Immutability and transparency are achieved by storing critical information and links onchain, making them tamper-resistant and auditable. Decentralized off-chain storage is used for scalability, with encrypted logs and user interactions accessible only to authorized parties, balancing transparency with privacy. This design ensures that Theoriq’s technology is distributed, secure, immutable where needed, and transparent, while also supporting privacy and scalability for its AI-powered agent economy. |
| H.2: Protocols and technical standards | Token and Vault Standards: The THQ token contract supports transfer, mint, and burn functions, and it's ERC-20-compatible, with additional custom hooks (ITHQTransferReceiver interface). The staking vault (sTHQ) is explicitly ERC-4626 compliant, enabling standardized tokenized vault operations for staking and yield. Smart Contract Architecture: Contracts use the UUPS (Universal Upgradeable Proxy Standard) proxy pattern for upgradeability. Role-based access control and pausable operations are implemented, consistent with OpenZeppelin's AccessControl and Pausable modules. Chain and Interoperability: The protocol is deployed first on Base, an EVM-compatible Layer 2 chain (Base is built on the OP Stack, though this is not explicitly stated in the context). The roadmap includes support for additional EVM chains and multi-chain agent operations, with cross-chain executors planned for interoperability and scalability. Agent SDK and Authentication: The Theoriq Agent SDK is available in Python, with agent authentication and authorization based on Biscuit Authorization (ed25519 cryptography). The SDK is designed for modular agent development and supports integration with frameworks such as LangChain, ARC, Eliza, and CrewAI. |
| H.3: Technology used | Theoriq manages access control using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and granular permissions, ensuring that only authorized entities can access sensitive information. Data storage is split between onchain storage for immutable, transparent records and decentralized off-chain solutions for scalability, with encrypted execution logs accessible only to designated key holders. All transfer and token management operations are governed by role-based permissions within the smart contracts. |
| H.4: Consensus mechanism | Consensus for Theoriq (THQ) is structured as an application-layer staking and slashing protocol deployed on Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 optimistic rollup. Theoriq does not operate its own Layer 1 blockchain or consensus mechanism; instead, it leverages the security and efficiency of the underlying Base network, which inherits Ethereum's Proof of Stake (PoS) finality. Security is achieved through a combination of economic staking (users stake THQ to mint sTHQ, which secures the protocol), slashing (misbehaving or underperforming agents can have their delegated stake slashed), and robust governance (supermajority of αTHQ holders approve slashing parameters). Additional security measures include audits, bug bounties, and dispute resolution processes. Efficiency is enhanced by the use of Base's scalable L2 infrastructure, hybrid onchain/off-chain data storage, and multi-chain EVM compatibility, allowing for low-cost, high-throughput operations and privacy-preserving execution logs. |
| H.5: Incentive mechanisms and applicable fees | Incentive mechanisms for Theoriq (THQ) are structured around staking, locking, delegation, and agent participation: Staking and Locking: Users and agents stake THQ to mint sTHQ, which secures the network and provides insurance against failures. Stakers earn THQ emissions and may receive partner token rewards. Locking sTHQ for 1–24 months in the AlphaLocker mints αTHQ, which is non-transferable and represents time-weighted power. Locked tokens earn enhanced emissions, initially funded by treasury donations and later by protocol revenue (from fee buybacks), as well as partner incentives. Delegation: αTHQ holders can delegate to specific agents, increasing agent ranking and execution capacity. Delegators receive protocol fee discounts and share in agent-specific rewards. Delegated αTHQ acts as slashable collateral; if an agent misbehaves, the delegated αTHQ and underlying sTHQ can be slashed and burned or redistributed, reinforcing network security. Protocol Fees: Fees are collected from agent activities such as strategy execution and vault management. These are performance fees, paid in the asset being managed (e.g., ETH for an ETH vault). These fees are the primary source for funding staking and locking rewards, via buybacks of THQ. onchain fee splitting is planned for future phases, but specific splits are not detailed. Fee Recipients and Handling: Protocol fees fund rewards for stakers, lockers, and delegators. Agents may also offer additional incentives to delegators. Slashed tokens from misbehaving agents are burned or may be redistributed for productive uses such as user reimbursement or further incentives. Network Sustainability: The system is designed so that protocol fees from agent activity are recycled into staking and locking rewards, with slashing and burning mechanisms to enforce security and deflation. The treasury is actively managed to support ecosystem incentives and ongoing adoption. |
| H.6: Use of distributed ledger technology | False |
| H.7: DLT functionality description | Not applicable |
| H.8: Audit | True |
| H.9: Audit outcome | The Theoriq protocol has undergone two comprehensive independent security audits — the first conducted by Hashlock, and the second by FYEO. Hashlock Audit Overview The review covered nine Solidity contracts including TheoriqToken, TheoriqTokenV2, AgentToken, Registry, and StakingPool, all written for the Ethereum network using compiler version ^0.8.26. Hashlock reported one medium-severity issue, two low-severity issues, and one minor quality-assurance note. The medium issue related to an uninitialized In its overall assessment, Hashlock found Theoriq’s codebase to be sound, consistent with best practices, and aligned with established security standards for upgradeable contracts. The report noted that while the protocol includes owner and administrator functions that centralize some control, these are intended to enhance operational security and depend on responsible internal governance. Hashlock concluded that, following the applied remediations, it could not identify any remaining vulnerabilities. The firm recommended continued diligence through bug-bounty programs or onchain monitoring to maintain security over time. FYEO Audit Overview The FYEO audit of Theoriq’s smart contracts, finalized in July 2025, concluded that the protocol remains secure and robust following the implementation of recent updates to its upgradeable contract system. The review focused on the updated Solidity contracts — AgentToken, TheoriqToken, TheoriqTokenV2, RegistryV2, and StakingPool — as well as the introduction of new reactive transfer interfaces (ITHQTransferReceiver and ITHQReceiver). The assessment examined changes related to UUPS (ERC1967) upgradeable proxy implementation, hard supply cap enforcement, role-based access control, and pause and ban mechanisms. FYEO also evaluated storage layout safety, migration integrity, and potential reentrancy exposure introduced through transfer hooks. The audit identified five issues in total, none of which were high or critical. Four were classified as Low or Informational and were fully remediated, while one was acknowledged for future design improvement. Specifically:
In its final assessment, FYEO concluded that Theoriq’s security posture is strong and unaffected by the recent updates, and the team’s responses effectively addressed all identified concerns. The report stated that users can interact with confidence, affirming the overall integrity of the protocol’s smart contract system. |
| Part I - Information on Risks | |
| I.1: Offer-related risks | Tokenomics/Vesting Risk: Smart Contract and Security Risks: The Theoriq has undergone an audit by Hashlock and FYEO, but as with all smart contracts, there remains a risk of vulnerabilities or exploits. AML/KYC Risk: Technical/Operational Risk: Governance/Centralization Risk: |
| I.2: Issuer-related risks | Financial Health: Nature and Stability of Business Activities: Legal and Regulatory Compliance Challenges: |
| I.3: Other tokens-related risks | Speculative Asset risk: Like most cryptocurrencies, THQ lacks intrinsic value. The token is not backed by any real-world asset, and its price is primarily driven by speculation surrounding the asset and its underlying network. This speculative nature could lead to significant volatility and potential loss of value. Regulatory risk: As cryptocurrencies represent a relatively new asset class, the regulatory landscape remains uncertain and continues to evolve. Future regulatory changes could adversely affect the token, its underlying network, or its holders. Tokenomics/Vesting Risk: Technical and Security Risks: A protocol or associated blockchains may contain coding errors or be subject to malicious attacks, which could result in security breaches, loss of funds, or reduced protocol functionality. Additionally, token holders also face risk of targeted hacks, phishing attempts, or loss of private key or hardware wallets. Market and Liquidity Risks: As with most crypto assets, THQ is subject to significant price volatility. Crypto assets could also be susceptible to low liquidity especially during times of high volatility. |
| I.4: Project implementation-related risks | Technical Risks: Operational/Resource Risks: Third-Party Dependencies: Governance/Tokenomics Risks: |
| I.5: Technology-related risks | Smart Contracts: Theoriq's core contracts use upgradeable proxy patterns (UUPS/ERC1967) for flexibility, but this introduces risks of storage layout mismatches, which can corrupt onchain state if not managed precisely. Reactive transfer hooks expand the attack surface for reentrancy or unauthorized callback execution. Specific issues were identified in the StakingPool's onTHQTransfer hook, which does not fully honor paused or banned states, potentially allowing yield donations from banned addresses or when the pool is paused. Cross-Chain: The protocol is designed for multi-chain support, initially launching on Base (an Ethereum L2), with plans to expand to other EVM-compatible chains. Cross-chain executors and fee splitting are planned, leaving potential risks around cross-chain message integrity and bridge security. Scalability: Theoriq employs a hybrid onchain/off-chain architecture. Critical, immutable data is stored onchain, while encrypted agent activities and user interactions are stored off-chain for scalability. This reduces onchain costs but introduces risks related to off-chain data availability and integrity. Wallet/Privacy: Access control is managed via Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and granular permissions. Execution logs and user interactions are encrypted and only accessible to designated key holders, supporting privacy but also creating risks if key management is compromised. L2 Dependencies: Theoriq initially launches on Base, making it dependent on the security and liveness of the Base L2, including its sequencer and cross-domain messaging. Future expansion to other L2s or EVM chains may introduce additional dependencies. |
| I.6: Mitigation measures | Audits/Security The protocol has undergone external security audits, which identified and remediated issues such as unbounded gas forwarding, missing pause and ban checks, and uninitialized storage or reentrancy guards. Specific mitigations include limiting gas forwarded to hooks, adding pause and ban checks, automating storage migration in deployment scripts, and removing or properly initializing reentrancy guards. Staking and Slashing: Staking and slashing mechanisms are in place to economically discourage malicious behavior by agents. Misbehaving agents can have their delegated stake slashed, providing a strong disincentive for attacks or protocol abuse. Use of Encryption: Sensitive data and execution logs are encrypted and stored off-chain, accessible only to authorized key holders. onchain storage is used for critical, immutable information, ensuring transparency and auditability while maintaining privacy. Continuous Security Assurance: Theoriq employs robust security audits and bug bounty programs to identify and address vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis. AI Safety and Governance: The protocol integrates both AI and human evaluators to continuously assess and improve the safety of agents and swarms. There are also social dispute resolution and arbitration processes, and collaboration with leading AI safety researchers. Protocol Upgrades and Migration Risks: Deployment scripts automate critical migrations (e.g., storage migration) to prevent uninitialized states that could disrupt protocol operations. |
| Part J – Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts | |
| S.1: Name | Theoriq (BVI) Ltd |
| S.2: Relevant legal entity identifier | 2549008HR6RRRZ9ZI573 |
| S.3: Name of the crypto-asset | THQ |
| S.4: Consensus mechanism | Token / No Consensus Algorithm |
| S.5: Incentive mechanisms and applicable fees | Tokens do not have an own consensus mechanism, but rely on the consensus mechanism of one or multiple underlying crypto-asset networks. Depending on the token design, incentive mechanisms arise from the utility, scarcity, or governance rights. |
| S.6: Beginning of period to which disclosed information relates | 2025-10-21 |
| S.7: End of period to which disclosed information relates | 2025-11-03 |
| S.8: Energy consumption | 29.26789 |
| S.9: Energy consumption sources and methodologies | "Data provided by CCRI; all indicators are based on a set of assumptions and thus represent estimates; methodology description and overview of input data, external datasets and underlying assumptions available at: https://carbon-ratings.com/dl/whitepaper-mica methods-2024 and https://docs.mica.api.carbon ratings.com. We do not account for any offsetting of energy consumption or other market-based mechanism as of today." |
| S.10: Renewable energy consumption | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.11: Energy intensity | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.12: Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - controlled | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.13: Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - purchased | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.14: GHG intensity | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.15: Key energy sources and methodologies | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |
| S.16: Key GHG sources and methodologies | Not applicable as the annual energy consumption is less than 500,000 kWh. |